SubscribeAdvertiser Index Get News Updates Print Edition RSS RSS Feed
Employment
The Holy Road
Sports
Business Directory
Legal Notices
Happy Ads
Headlines October 23, 2008
Search Archives

Storytellers series: Fencing the West, Buffalo to Barbed Wire

Charlie Abourezk at the storytelling event.
RAPID CITY - The transformation of open range to closed range came about when Indian Country became Cowboy Country, and that conversion was accomplished by means of colonization, Rapid City attorney Charlie Abourezk told a crowd gathered at the Journey Museum on Sunday, Oct. 5.

Once colonization was complete, racism settled in, and the combination resulted in economic disaster for the Indian people, he said.

Abourezk was the first speaker in the Storytellers Series, part of the Journey's exhibit "Fencing the West: Buffalo to Barbed Wire."

Abourezk outlined the four steps of the British mode of colonization, which was applied by European settlers in this country.

"The first step was to dislocate traditional agriculture and food gathering, essentially to destroy people's traditional way of obtaining food and surviving off the land, and replace it with something that you could make the colonial subjects be dependent upon," Abourezk said.

That dislocation was achieved by killing off buffalo herds and confining tribes to reservations, leaving tribes dependent on government commodities, he said.

This photograph of a Plains Indian woman and children is part of the exhibit, "Fencing the West: Buffalo to Barbed Wire" now showing at the Journey Museum in Rapid City.
The second step was to divide up communally owned land and transfer it into private ownership, a move Abourezk said was designed to get Native people to appreciate market capitalism while divesting them of their land.

"The government knew what it was doing," he said. "Teddy Roosevelt, who was then a congressman who was a proponent of the Allotment Act or the Dawes Act, got up on the floor of the Congress and called it ' mighty pulverizing.'

The third step of colonization was establishing a Native "ruling elite," consisting of "paper chiefs" who got that title from the U.S. government rather than their own people, Abourezk said. That step put the appointed chiefs in a position to carry out government programs, diverting Natives' anger away from the government and toward their own people.

That effort was assisted by the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, which got rid of traditional tribal government and installed federall

y-sanctioned modes of government based on the U.S. Constitution.

Abourezk said that interference led to confusion that still exists, in part because the new form of government didn't provide for separation of powers. As a result, tribal councils could fire judges who made unpopular decisions.

The fourth step of colonization was to get Native people on board with white culture, he said, a goal of the U.S. government's relocation program in which Native people were given one-way tickets to large cities where they could get a job or an education.

That move backfired, however, when the children of the relocated Natives "later became the Indian activists that we know about in the 1970s and '80s," he said.

Abourezk said the colonizing of a nation within a purportedly democratic nation has led to illogical Indian law.

"The government is trying to both adhere to its democratic and constitutional principles on the one hand, while at the other hand straining to try to achieve the goals of a colonizer," he said. "The vagaries of settler colonialism require that the logic of the law be bent and twisted to fit a certain result."

After colonization had successfully dominated Native people and land, Abourezk said, racism continued to keep indigenous people in check.

"We saw the machinery of colonization gradually replaced by the machinery of racial and cultural dominance," he said. "This system in modern times has come to be called racism, but before you flinch, I want to pull you back and look at it as the remnants of a colonial system, as well as a system which has sort of gained a life of its own."

Abourezk said white people now criticize Indian people for being poor without recognizing that racism, born of colonialism, has caused their poverty.

One part of the solution needs to be a change in federal policy to stimulate economies on reservations, to make possible what white people would be able to do if they were in the same circumstances, he said.

"It has nothing to do with 'Indian' and everything to do with economics," Abourezk said.

Economically speaking, South Dakota is a poor state when compared with certain other states, and Abourezk said that fact should unite us rather than divide us.

"If we started to see our common ground, and how our stories merge and how our histories merge and how we're all one people now, I think the Indians and the ranchers and farmers and small businessmen of the state have a lot more in common than they do differences," he said.

Go to journeymuseum.org. for a full listing.
Reader Comments
No comments have been posted. Be the first!


Other Stories With Comments:
ArticleComments
Rosebud signs wind turbine agreement 1
Crazy Horse Monument's Ziolkowski family provides gifts for students 1
Obama a hope for Indian country as was Kennedy 1
Iraq soldier carries on military tradition 1
Broken English and broken Lakota 1
OST Election Commission releases executive board candidate list 1
Worst damage in 60 years slams Lacreek Electric area 1
Some more broken Lakota 1
Section 17 Federal Corporate Charter: Setting the record straight 1
Voting for deeds over promises 1



Click ads below
for larger version